Refusing a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) test after being stopped for suspected drunk driving can lead to serious consequences. Most states follow implied consent laws, which means that by driving, you agree to submit to chemical testing if an officer has reason to believe you’re under the influence. Refusing the test can result in an automatic driver’s license suspension, even if you are not convicted of driving while intoxicated (DWI). It can also be used as evidence in court to suggest that you were trying to hide intoxication. In some cases, officers may still get a warrant to take a blood sample without your consent.
If you are charged with a DWI after refusing a BAC test, a skilled DWI defense attorney can help. They can examine how the stop and arrest were handled, challenge the refusal evidence, and determine whether your rights were violated. An experienced lawyer can fight for reduced penalties or even a dismissal, depending on the facts of your case.
Potential Consequences of Refusing a BAC Test
Refusing a blood or breath alcohol concentration (BAC) test after being stopped for suspected DWI can lead to serious consequences. For example, Texas has an “implied consent” law, which means that by driving on Texas roads, you automatically agree to take a chemical test if a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe you’re driving under the influence.
If you refuse to take the BAC test, the officer can’t force you to take it (unless a warrant is obtained), but your refusal comes with penalties. One major consequence is the automatic suspension of your driver’s license. For a first-time refusal, your license can be suspended for 180 days. If you have previously refused a test or have prior alcohol-related offenses, the suspension can be extended to two years.
Your refusal can also be used as evidence against you in court. Prosecutors may argue that you refused testing because you knew you were intoxicated. This can make it harder to defend yourself in a DWI case. Even if there is no BAC test result, other evidence—such as the officer’s observations, field sobriety tests, or video footage—can still be used to convict you.
Refusing the BAC test does not mean you won’t be arrested or charged with DWI. In fact, officers may still get a search warrant to force a blood test, especially in cases involving accidents, injuries, or repeat offenses. So, refusing may only delay testing, not avoid it.
Additionally, if your license is suspended due to refusal, you may be eligible for an Occupational Driver’s License (ODL). This allows you to drive to work, school, or essential places, but you must apply through the court, and approval isn’t guaranteed.
Overall, refusing a BAC test in Texas can make your situation worse. It adds extra penalties, can harm your legal defense, and may still result in testing through a warrant. A DWI charge is serious on its own, but a refusal complicates matters further.
If you’re facing DWI charges, it’s important to contact an experienced criminal defense lawyer right away. They can explain your rights, build a strong defense, and help protect your future.
What Does a Prosecutor Need to Establish in a DWI Case Against You?
To convict someone of DWI, a prosecutor must prove several key elements beyond a reasonable doubt. These elements are based on laws that define what it means to operate a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol or drugs. Each part must be clearly established using evidence such as police reports, test results, and witness testimony.
- First, the prosecutor must show that the person was “operating” a motor vehicle. This doesn’t always mean the person was driving on a highway. Courts have ruled that even sitting behind the wheel with the keys in the ignition or having control of the vehicle while it’s running can meet the definition of “operating.” This element can sometimes be challenged if the vehicle wasn’t moving or the person wasn’t in full control at the time.
- Second, the prosecutor needs to prove that the person was intoxicated at the time of operation. Intoxication can be shown in one of two ways. One is by demonstrating that the person had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08 percent or higher. This can be proven through breath, blood, or urine tests administered by law enforcement. The second method is by showing that the person lost the normal use of their mental or physical faculties due to alcohol, drugs, or a combination of both. This can include slurred speech, poor coordination, red eyes, or the inability to perform field sobriety tests.
- The prosecutor may use multiple types of evidence to prove intoxication, including the officer’s observations, dashcam footage, witness statements, and chemical test results. If any of the evidence was collected improperly or the person’s rights were violated during the arrest, the defense may challenge its use in court.
- Finally, the prosecution must link the intoxication directly to the operation of the vehicle. For example, if a person is found intoxicated but there’s no proof they were driving, a conviction may be harder to achieve.
In short, to secure a DWI conviction, the prosecutor must build a solid case that clearly shows the person was operating a vehicle while legally intoxicated, using credible evidence and following proper procedures.
Potential DWI Defenses Related to a BAC Test
If you are charged with DWI, there are several potential defenses related to the BAC test that may be available. These defenses focus on the accuracy, legality, and reliability of how the test was conducted and how the results were handled.
One possible defense is challenging the legality of the traffic stop. If the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to pull you over, any evidence gathered afterward—including BAC test results—may be ruled inadmissible. Without this evidence, the prosecution can have a much harder time proving its case.
Another common defense involves questioning the accuracy of the BAC testing device. Breathalyzer machines must be properly calibrated and maintained. If the machine was not working correctly or had not been recently checked, the results could be inaccurate. Even small errors in calibration can lead to inflated BAC readings.
The person operating the testing equipment must also be properly trained. If the officer did not follow the correct procedure when giving the breath or blood test, the results may be considered unreliable. For example, failure to observe the driver for a specific time before administering the test could allow substances like mouthwash or recent vomiting to interfere with the results.
Chain of custody is another important issue, especially in blood tests. If the sample was not properly handled, stored, or documented, there is a risk that it was contaminated or mixed up with someone else’s. Defense attorneys often look at these records carefully to find mistakes that could weaken the prosecution’s case.
Rising BAC is another defense that applies in some situations. Alcohol takes time to absorb into the bloodstream. If you had drinks shortly before driving and were tested some time later, your BAC may have been under the legal limit while you were driving, but over the limit at the time of testing. This delay could cast doubt on whether you were legally intoxicated while operating the vehicle.
A strong legal defense can lead to reduced charges, a dismissal, or even an acquittal.
Ways of Resolving a DWI Case
When facing a DWI charge involving a BAC test, there are several ways the case can be resolved. The two most common paths are accepting a plea deal or taking the case to trial. Each option has its own risks and benefits, and a skilled criminal defense lawyer can help you decide which route is best for your situation.
A plea deal is an agreement between the defense and the prosecution. In many cases, the prosecutor may offer to reduce the charges or recommend a lighter sentence if you agree to plead guilty or no contest. For example, a DWI charge could be reduced to a lesser offense, such as reckless driving, especially if the BAC was close to the legal limit and there were no aggravating factors like an accident or a prior record. Plea deals can help you avoid the uncertainty of a trial and may lead to reduced fines, shorter license suspension, or a lesser impact on your criminal record.
However, a plea deal is not always the right choice. If there are strong defenses available—such as errors in the BAC testing process, an illegal traffic stop, or a lack of evidence showing you were actually driving—your lawyer may recommend going to trial. At trial, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you were operating a vehicle while legally intoxicated. If they cannot meet this burden, the jury or judge may find you not guilty.
A criminal defense lawyer plays a key role throughout this process. They will carefully review the BAC test results, how the test was conducted, and whether your rights were respected during the stop and arrest. They will also consider your personal circumstances, such as your criminal history, job, and need for a driver’s license. With this information, they can negotiate effectively with the prosecutor or build a strong defense for trial.
Ultimately, resolving a DWI case requires careful consideration of the facts, evidence, and possible outcomes. Whether through a plea deal or a trial, a knowledgeable defense lawyer can guide you through the process and work to achieve the best possible result for your future.
How Can a Lawyer Handle Your DWI Case for You?
A knowledgeable criminal defense attorney can be a powerful advocate when you’re facing a DWI charge, especially if a BAC test is involved. These cases can be complex, and an experienced lawyer knows how to examine every detail to protect your rights and fight for the best possible outcome.
One of the first things your attorney will do is review how the traffic stop occurred. If the officer didn’t have reasonable suspicion to pull you over or didn’t follow proper procedures, your lawyer may be able to file a motion to suppress key evidence, including the BAC test results. If that evidence is thrown out, the case may become too weak for the prosecutor to move forward.
Next, your attorney will look at how the BAC test was administered. Breathalyzer machines and blood testing equipment must be properly maintained and used correctly. If the device was not calibrated or if the officer didn’t follow the proper steps, the results may be inaccurate. Your lawyer can bring in expert witnesses to challenge the reliability of the test and raise doubts about whether you were legally intoxicated.
In some cases, your attorney may also argue that your BAC was still rising at the time of the test, meaning you were under the legal limit while driving but over the limit by the time the test was done. This “rising BAC” defense can be effective, especially if there was a delay between being pulled over and being tested.
A good criminal defense lawyer will also evaluate whether a plea deal might be in your best interest. If going to trial would be too risky, your lawyer may be able to negotiate reduced charges or a lighter sentence, like avoiding jail time, reducing fines, or preserving your license.
Finally, your lawyer will guide you through every step of the legal process, explain your rights, and help reduce the stress that comes with facing a criminal charge. Whether through filing motions, negotiating with the prosecution, or defending you in court, a skilled attorney can make a major difference in the outcome of your DWI case.
Contact a Knowledgeable DWI Defense Lawyer Right Away
If you are currently facing a DWI charge, you need experienced legal counsel in your corner right away. A strong criminal defense attorney can handle every step of the process for you, represent you during legal proceedings, or negotiate with prosecutors to pursue the best possible result in your criminal case.
About The Author:
Brandon Fulgham has an in-depth understanding of both Texas law and Texans themselves. Before practicing law here, he received his undergraduate degree from TCU and his law degree from South Texas College of Law in Houston. After graduation, he worked in District Attorneys’ offices as a prosecutor. Now, he uses that knowledge to anticipate opposing counsel’s arguments and protect the rights of people in and around Fort Worth. His work has been recognized by Expertise (Best Criminal Defense Lawyers in Forth Worth and Best DUI Lawyers in Fort Worth, both 2020), Fort Worth Magazine, and The National Trial Lawyers, just to name a few.
Author's Bio